|
Austin: Temp Budget Bad for Military 09/09 06:04
Passage of a six-month temporary spending bill would have widespread and
devastating effects on the Defense Department, Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin said
in a letter to key members of Congress on Sunday.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Passage of a six-month temporary spending bill would have
widespread and devastating effects on the Defense Department, Pentagon chief
Lloyd Austin said in a letter to key members of Congress on Sunday.
Austin said that passing a continuing resolution that caps spending at 2024
levels, rather than taking action on the proposed 2025 budget will hurt
thousands of defense programs, and damage military recruiting just as it is
beginning to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic.
"Asking the department to compete with (China), let alone manage conflicts
in Europe and the Middle East, while under a lengthy CR, ties our hands behind
our back while expecting us to be agile and to accelerate progress," said
Austin in the letter to leaders of the House and Senate appropriations
committees.
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson has teed up a vote this week on a bill
that would keep the federal government funded for six more months. The measure
aims to garner support from his more conservative GOP members by also requiring
states to obtain proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport,
when registering a person to vote.
Congress needs to approve a stop-gap spending bill before the end of the
budget year on Sept. 30 to avoid a government shutdown just a few weeks before
voters go to the polls and elect the next president.
Austin said the stop-gap measure would cut defense spending by more than $6
billion compared to the 2025 spending proposal. And it would take money from
key new priorities while overfunding programs that no longer need it.
Under a continuing resolution, new projects or programs can't be started.
Austin said that passing the temporary bill would stall more than $4.3 billion
in research and development projects and delay 135 new military housing and
construction projects totaling nearly $10 billion.
It also would slow progress on a number of key nuclear, ship-building,
high-tech drone and other weapons programs. Many of those projects are in an
array of congressional districts, and could also have an impact on local
residents and jobs.
Since the bill would not fund legally required pay raises for troops and
civilians, the department would have to find other cuts to offset them. Those
cuts could halt enlistment bonuses, delay training for National Guard and
Reserve forces, limit flying hours and other training for active-duty troops
and impede the replacement of weapons and other equipment that has been pulled
from Pentagon stocks and sent to Ukraine.
Going forward with the continuing resolution, said Austin, will "subject
service members and their families to unnecessary stress, empower our
adversaries, misalign billions of dollars, damage our readiness, and impede our
ability to react to emergent events."
Noting that there have been 48 continuing resolutions during 14 of the last
15 fiscal years -- for a total of nearly 1,800 days -- Austin said Congress
must break the pattern of inaction because the U.S. military can't compete with
China "with our hands tied behind our back every fiscal year."
Johnson's bill is not expected to get support in the Democratic-controlled
Senate, if it even makes it that far. But Congress will have to pass some type
of temporary measure by Sept. 30 in order to avoid a shutdown.
|
|